Multi Cap Fund · head to head · AMFI NAVs

ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund vs Quant Multi Cap Fund: SIP returns compared

Same ₹10,000 monthly SIP, same dates, Direct plans: over the last 5 years ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund is worth ₹8.25 L (XIRR 13.1%) and Quant Multi Cap Fund ₹7.49 L (XIRR 9.1%) — ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund ahead by ₹75,572. Across every 5-year SIP since Feb 2013, ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund finished ahead in 30 of 105 and Quant Multi Cap Fund in 75.

Same SIP in both funds · real NAVsLive

Historical simulation on actual NAVs — not a forecast and not investment advice. Disclaimer

₹10,000
6%

ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund: invested — over — instalments; valued at NAV of —:

Value today
—
XIRR —
Post-tax
—
If fully redeemed today
Real XIRR
—
After assumed inflation

YearInvestedICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund valueXIRR to date

₹10,000 a month in each: what it became

Each row is a monthly SIP ending today (1 Oct 2026), Direct plans. Post-tax assumes everything is redeemed today with no other capital gains this year.

SIP periodInvestedICICI Prudential Multi Cap FundXIRRQuant Multi Cap FundXIRRPost-tax (both)
1 year₹1,20,000₹1.20 L-0.2%₹1.25 L9.5%₹1.20 L / ₹1.24 L
3 years₹3,60,000₹3.92 L5.9%₹3.78 L3.3%₹3.92 L / ₹3.77 L
5 years₹6,00,000₹8.25 L13.1%₹7.49 L9.1%₹8.12 L / ₹7.46 L
10 years₹12,00,000₹26.70 L15.5%₹29.98 L17.7%₹25.05 L / ₹27.92 L

Every 5-year SIP, head to head

We started the same SIP in both funds in every month both have NAVs for — 105 SIPs, the first starting Feb 2013. ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund finished ahead in 29% of them; the median gap was 4.4 percentage points a year in Quant Multi Cap Fund's favour.

Downside on the same dates: ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund's worst 5-year SIP returned -7.1% a year (started Apr 2015) and 3 of 105 lost money; Quant Multi Cap Fund's worst returned -4.5% (started Apr 2015) and 1 lost money.

-10%0%10%20%30%Feb 2013Oct 2021
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap FundQuant Multi Cap Fund

XIRR of every 5-year monthly SIP by the month it started. Gap = ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund minus Quant Multi Cap Fund, percentage points a year.

WindowSIPs comparedAhead (ICICI / Quant)Median gapWorst gapBest gap
3-year SIPs12939% / 61%-0.9 pp-23.3 ppstarted May 2018+11.7 ppstarted Mar 2023
5-year SIPs10529% / 71%-4.4 pp-15.1 ppstarted Apr 2017+8.2 ppstarted Mar 2021

Against an index fund, and the cost of the Regular plan

  • ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 100% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +5.6 pp a year) — ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹1,37,520 below Direct.
  • Quant Multi Cap Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 63% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +2.5 pp a year) — Quant Multi Cap Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • Quant Multi Cap Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹2,12,375 below Direct.

Questions

Which has given better SIP returns, ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund or Quant Multi Cap Fund?

Over the last 5 years a ₹10,000 monthly SIP (Direct plans) is worth ₹8.25 L in ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund (XIRR 13.1%) and ₹7.49 L in Quant Multi Cap Fund (XIRR 9.1%). Past returns don't tell you which will do better next.

Has ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund beaten Quant Multi Cap Fund consistently?

In 29% of 105 rolling 5-year SIPs started on the same dates (from Feb 2013), ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund ended ahead of Quant Multi Cap Fund (Direct plans). The median difference was -4.4 percentage points a year.

Where does this data come from?

Official daily NAVs published by AMFI. SIP instalments fall on the first business day of each month; both funds are compared on identical dates. Updated monthly.

Comparison on official AMFI NAVs, SIP on the first business day of each month, identical dates for both funds. It shows what happened, not which fund to buy — past performance does not indicate future returns. sipcalculatorhub.com is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Methodology.

More comparisons