Large & Mid Cap Fund · head to head · AMFI NAVs

Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund vs UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund: SIP returns compared

Same ₹10,000 monthly SIP, same dates, Direct plans: over the last 5 years Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund is worth ₹8.13 L (XIRR 12.5%) and UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund ₹8.06 L (XIRR 12.1%) — Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund ahead by ₹6,940. Across every 5-year SIP since Feb 2013, Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund finished ahead in 85 of 105 and UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund in 20.

Same SIP in both funds · real NAVsLive

Historical simulation on actual NAVs — not a forecast and not investment advice. Disclaimer

₹10,000
6%

Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund: invested — over — instalments; valued at NAV of —:

Value today
—
XIRR —
Post-tax
—
If fully redeemed today
Real XIRR
—
After assumed inflation

YearInvestedQuant Large & Mid Cap Fund valueXIRR to date

₹10,000 a month in each: what it became

Each row is a monthly SIP ending today (1 Oct 2026), Direct plans. Post-tax assumes everything is redeemed today with no other capital gains this year.

SIP periodInvestedQuant Large & Mid Cap FundXIRRUTI Large & Mid Cap FundXIRRPost-tax (both)
1 year₹1,20,000₹1.25 L8.4%₹1.16 L-7.6%₹1.24 L / ₹1.16 L
3 years₹3,60,000₹3.87 L5.0%₹3.81 L3.9%₹3.86 L / ₹3.81 L
5 years₹6,00,000₹8.13 L12.5%₹8.06 L12.1%₹8.01 L / ₹7.96 L
10 years₹12,00,000₹28.43 L16.7%₹26.05 L15.0%₹26.55 L / ₹24.48 L

Every 5-year SIP, head to head

We started the same SIP in both funds in every month both have NAVs for — 105 SIPs, the first starting Feb 2013. Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund finished ahead in 81% of them; the median gap was 3.6 percentage points a year in Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's favour.

Downside on the same dates: Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund's worst 5-year SIP returned -3.0% a year (started Apr 2015) and 1 of 105 lost money; UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund's worst returned -11.2% (started Apr 2015) and 4 lost money.

-10%0%10%20%30%40%Feb 2013Oct 2021
Quant Large & Mid Cap FundUTI Large & Mid Cap Fund

XIRR of every 5-year monthly SIP by the month it started. Gap = Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund minus UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund, percentage points a year.

WindowSIPs comparedAhead (Quant / UTI)Median gapWorst gapBest gap
3-year SIPs12977% / 23%+2.8 pp-11.7 ppstarted Feb 2023+18.3 ppstarted Jul 2013
5-year SIPs10581% / 19%+3.6 pp-6.3 ppstarted Feb 2021+9.3 ppstarted May 2015

Against an index fund, and the cost of the Regular plan

  • Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 84% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +6.1 pp a year) — Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹2,04,176 below Direct.
  • UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 100% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +5.7 pp a year) — UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹1,11,414 below Direct.

Questions

Which has given better SIP returns, Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund or UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund?

Over the last 5 years a ₹10,000 monthly SIP (Direct plans) is worth ₹8.13 L in Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund (XIRR 12.5%) and ₹8.06 L in UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund (XIRR 12.1%). Past returns don't tell you which will do better next.

Has Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund beaten UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund consistently?

In 81% of 105 rolling 5-year SIPs started on the same dates (from Feb 2013), Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund ended ahead of UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund (Direct plans). The median difference was +3.6 percentage points a year.

Where does this data come from?

Official daily NAVs published by AMFI. SIP instalments fall on the first business day of each month; both funds are compared on identical dates. Updated monthly.

Comparison on official AMFI NAVs, SIP on the first business day of each month, identical dates for both funds. It shows what happened, not which fund to buy — past performance does not indicate future returns. sipcalculatorhub.com is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Methodology.

More comparisons