Mid Cap Fund · head to head · AMFI NAVs

Quant Mid Cap Fund vs UTI Mid Cap Fund: SIP returns compared

Same ₹10,000 monthly SIP, same dates, Direct plans: over the last 5 years Quant Mid Cap Fund is worth ₹7.75 L (XIRR 10.5%) and UTI Mid Cap Fund ₹7.68 L (XIRR 10.2%) — Quant Mid Cap Fund ahead by ₹6,501. Across every 5-year SIP since Feb 2013, Quant Mid Cap Fund finished ahead in 83 of 105 and UTI Mid Cap Fund in 22.

Same SIP in both funds · real NAVsLive

Historical simulation on actual NAVs — not a forecast and not investment advice. Disclaimer

₹10,000
6%

Quant Mid Cap Fund: invested — over — instalments; valued at NAV of —:

Value today
—
XIRR —
Post-tax
—
If fully redeemed today
Real XIRR
—
After assumed inflation

YearInvestedQuant Mid Cap Fund valueXIRR to date

₹10,000 a month in each: what it became

Each row is a monthly SIP ending today (1 Oct 2026), Direct plans. Post-tax assumes everything is redeemed today with no other capital gains this year.

SIP periodInvestedQuant Mid Cap FundXIRRUTI Mid Cap FundXIRRPost-tax (both)
1 year₹1,20,000₹1.21 L2.5%₹1.19 L-1.5%₹1.21 L / ₹1.19 L
3 years₹3,60,000₹3.65 L1.0%₹3.80 L3.7%₹3.65 L / ₹3.80 L
5 years₹6,00,000₹7.75 L10.5%₹7.68 L10.2%₹7.69 L / ₹7.63 L
10 years₹12,00,000₹32.16 L19.0%₹25.76 L14.8%₹29.82 L / ₹24.23 L

Every 5-year SIP, head to head

We started the same SIP in both funds in every month both have NAVs for — 105 SIPs, the first starting Feb 2013. Quant Mid Cap Fund finished ahead in 79% of them; the median gap was 3.6 percentage points a year in Quant Mid Cap Fund's favour.

Downside on the same dates: Quant Mid Cap Fund's worst 5-year SIP returned -6.0% a year (started Apr 2015) and 1 of 105 lost money; UTI Mid Cap Fund's worst returned -7.7% (started Apr 2015) and 3 lost money.

-10%0%10%20%30%40%Feb 2013Oct 2021
Quant Mid Cap FundUTI Mid Cap Fund

XIRR of every 5-year monthly SIP by the month it started. Gap = Quant Mid Cap Fund minus UTI Mid Cap Fund, percentage points a year.

WindowSIPs comparedAhead (Quant / UTI)Median gapWorst gapBest gap
3-year SIPs12966% / 34%+3.3 pp-21.4 ppstarted Oct 2013+19.6 ppstarted Jun 2021
5-year SIPs10579% / 21%+3.6 pp-12.9 ppstarted Feb 2013+16.4 ppstarted Jun 2019

Against an index fund, and the cost of the Regular plan

  • Quant Mid Cap Fund beat a plain Nifty Midcap 150 index fund in 53% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +1.4 pp a year) — Quant Mid Cap Fund vs Nifty Midcap 150 index fund.
  • Quant Mid Cap Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹2,81,913 below Direct.
  • UTI Mid Cap Fund beat a plain Nifty Midcap 150 index fund in 2% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap -4.4 pp a year) — UTI Mid Cap Fund vs Nifty Midcap 150 index fund.
  • UTI Mid Cap Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹1,38,486 below Direct.

Questions

Which has given better SIP returns, Quant Mid Cap Fund or UTI Mid Cap Fund?

Over the last 5 years a ₹10,000 monthly SIP (Direct plans) is worth ₹7.75 L in Quant Mid Cap Fund (XIRR 10.5%) and ₹7.68 L in UTI Mid Cap Fund (XIRR 10.2%). Past returns don't tell you which will do better next.

Has Quant Mid Cap Fund beaten UTI Mid Cap Fund consistently?

In 79% of 105 rolling 5-year SIPs started on the same dates (from Feb 2013), Quant Mid Cap Fund ended ahead of UTI Mid Cap Fund (Direct plans). The median difference was +3.6 percentage points a year.

Where does this data come from?

Official daily NAVs published by AMFI. SIP instalments fall on the first business day of each month; both funds are compared on identical dates. Updated monthly.

Comparison on official AMFI NAVs, SIP on the first business day of each month, identical dates for both funds. It shows what happened, not which fund to buy — past performance does not indicate future returns. sipcalculatorhub.com is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Methodology.

More comparisons