ELSS (Tax Saver) · head to head · AMFI NAVs

Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund vs UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund: SIP returns compared

Same ₹10,000 monthly SIP, same dates, Direct plans: over the last 5 years Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund is worth ₹7.08 L (XIRR 6.8%) and UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund ₹6.84 L (XIRR 5.4%) — Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund ahead by ₹23,894. Across every 3-year SIP since Aug 2019, Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund finished ahead in 47 of 51 and UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund in 4.

Same SIP in both funds · real NAVsLive

Historical simulation on actual NAVs — not a forecast and not investment advice. Disclaimer

₹10,000
6%

Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund: invested — over — instalments; valued at NAV of —:

Value today
—
XIRR —
Post-tax
—
If fully redeemed today
Real XIRR
—
After assumed inflation

YearInvestedParag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund valueXIRR to date

₹10,000 a month in each: what it became

Each row is a monthly SIP ending today (1 Oct 2026), Direct plans. Post-tax assumes everything is redeemed today with no other capital gains this year.

SIP periodInvestedParag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver FundXIRRUTI ELSS Tax Saver FundXIRRPost-tax (both)
1 year₹1,20,000₹1.13 L-13.2%₹1.14 L-11.0%₹1.13 L / ₹1.14 L
3 years₹3,60,000₹3.51 L-1.7%₹3.55 L-1.1%₹3.51 L / ₹3.55 L
5 years₹6,00,000₹7.08 L6.8%₹6.84 L5.4%₹7.08 L / ₹6.84 L

Every 3-year SIP, head to head

We started the same SIP in both funds in every month both have NAVs for — 51 SIPs, the first starting Aug 2019. Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund finished ahead in 92% of them; the median gap was 5.3 percentage points a year in Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund's favour.

Downside on the same dates: Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund's worst 3-year SIP returned -1.2% a year (started Oct 2023) and 1 of 51 lost money; UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund's worst returned -0.6% (started Oct 2023) and 1 lost money.

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%Aug 2019Oct 2023
Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver FundUTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund

XIRR of every 3-year monthly SIP by the month it started. Gap = Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund minus UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund, percentage points a year.

WindowSIPs comparedAhead (Parag / UTI)Median gapWorst gapBest gap
3-year SIPs5192% / 8%+5.3 pp-1.7 ppstarted Sep 2023+9.3 ppstarted Feb 2020
5-year SIPs27100% / 0%+4.3 pp+0.9 ppstarted Sep 2021+6.9 ppstarted Mar 2020

Against an index fund, and the cost of the Regular plan

  • Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 84% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +3.3 pp a year) — Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund: the Regular plan of the same 5-year SIP ended ₹21,628 below Direct.
  • UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 2% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap -1.6 pp a year) — UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹1,16,643 below Direct.

Questions

Which has given better SIP returns, Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund or UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund?

Over the last 5 years a ₹10,000 monthly SIP (Direct plans) is worth ₹7.08 L in Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund (XIRR 6.8%) and ₹6.84 L in UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund (XIRR 5.4%). Past returns don't tell you which will do better next.

Has Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund beaten UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund consistently?

In 92% of 51 rolling 3-year SIPs started on the same dates (from Aug 2019), Parag Parikh ELSS Tax Saver Fund ended ahead of UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund (Direct plans). The median difference was +5.3 percentage points a year.

Where does this data come from?

Official daily NAVs published by AMFI. SIP instalments fall on the first business day of each month; both funds are compared on identical dates. Updated monthly.

Comparison on official AMFI NAVs, SIP on the first business day of each month, identical dates for both funds. It shows what happened, not which fund to buy — past performance does not indicate future returns. sipcalculatorhub.com is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Methodology.

More comparisons