Value Fund · head to head · AMFI NAVs

ICICI Prudential Value Fund vs Nippon India Value Fund: SIP returns compared

Same ₹10,000 monthly SIP, same dates, Direct plans: over the last 5 years ICICI Prudential Value Fund is worth ₹7.55 L (XIRR 9.4%) and Nippon India Value Fund ₹7.69 L (XIRR 10.2%) — Nippon India Value Fund ahead by ₹14,317. Across every 5-year SIP since Jan 2013, ICICI Prudential Value Fund finished ahead in 47 of 106 and Nippon India Value Fund in 59.

Same SIP in both funds · real NAVsLive

Historical simulation on actual NAVs — not a forecast and not investment advice. Disclaimer

₹10,000
6%

ICICI Prudential Value Fund: invested — over — instalments; valued at NAV of —:

Value today
—
XIRR —
Post-tax
—
If fully redeemed today
Real XIRR
—
After assumed inflation

YearInvestedICICI Prudential Value Fund valueXIRR to date

₹10,000 a month in each: what it became

Each row is a monthly SIP ending today (1 Oct 2026), Direct plans. Post-tax assumes everything is redeemed today with no other capital gains this year.

SIP periodInvestedICICI Prudential Value FundXIRRNippon India Value FundXIRRPost-tax (both)
1 year₹1,20,000₹1.11 L-15.3%₹1.13 L-12.5%₹1.11 L / ₹1.13 L
3 years₹3,60,000₹3.60 L-0.0%₹3.60 L0.0%₹3.60 L / ₹3.60 L
5 years₹6,00,000₹7.55 L9.4%₹7.69 L10.2%₹7.51 L / ₹7.64 L
10 years₹12,00,000₹26.15 L15.1%₹26.04 L15.0%₹24.57 L / ₹24.48 L

Every 5-year SIP, head to head

We started the same SIP in both funds in every month both have NAVs for — 106 SIPs, the first starting Jan 2013. ICICI Prudential Value Fund finished ahead in 44% of them; the median gap was 0.2 percentage points a year in Nippon India Value Fund's favour.

Downside on the same dates: ICICI Prudential Value Fund's worst 5-year SIP returned -8.4% a year (started Apr 2015) and 2 of 106 lost money; Nippon India Value Fund's worst returned -7.2% (started Apr 2015) and 3 lost money.

-10%-5%0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%Jan 2013Oct 2021
ICICI Prudential Value FundNippon India Value Fund

XIRR of every 5-year monthly SIP by the month it started. Gap = ICICI Prudential Value Fund minus Nippon India Value Fund, percentage points a year.

WindowSIPs comparedAhead (ICICI / Nippon)Median gapWorst gapBest gap
3-year SIPs13046% / 54%-0.5 pp-8.0 ppstarted Jan 2015+9.5 ppstarted Mar 2013
5-year SIPs10644% / 56%-0.2 pp-4.9 ppstarted Mar 2015+4.6 ppstarted Apr 2018

Against an index fund, and the cost of the Regular plan

  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 94% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +6.9 pp a year) — ICICI Prudential Value Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹89,356 below Direct.
  • Nippon India Value Fund beat a plain Nifty 500 index fund in 96% of 49 rolling 3-year SIPs (median gap +5.5 pp a year) — Nippon India Value Fund vs Nifty 500 index fund.
  • Nippon India Value Fund: the Regular plan of the same 10-year SIP ended ₹1,10,519 below Direct.

Questions

Which has given better SIP returns, ICICI Prudential Value Fund or Nippon India Value Fund?

Over the last 5 years a ₹10,000 monthly SIP (Direct plans) is worth ₹7.55 L in ICICI Prudential Value Fund (XIRR 9.4%) and ₹7.69 L in Nippon India Value Fund (XIRR 10.2%). Past returns don't tell you which will do better next.

Has ICICI Prudential Value Fund beaten Nippon India Value Fund consistently?

In 44% of 106 rolling 5-year SIPs started on the same dates (from Jan 2013), ICICI Prudential Value Fund ended ahead of Nippon India Value Fund (Direct plans). The median difference was -0.2 percentage points a year.

Where does this data come from?

Official daily NAVs published by AMFI. SIP instalments fall on the first business day of each month; both funds are compared on identical dates. Updated monthly.

Comparison on official AMFI NAVs, SIP on the first business day of each month, identical dates for both funds. It shows what happened, not which fund to buy — past performance does not indicate future returns. sipcalculatorhub.com is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Methodology.

More comparisons